The 18-month master’s program is intended mainly for mid-career professionals — generally hospital and clinic administrators, health care consultants, medical educators, or managers from health-related industries.
Kim . . . said he hopes Dartmouth’s effort will spark a new profession of health care delivery experts whose aim will be to make medical care simultaneously less costly and more effective.
“In five years,’’ he said, “there have to be 15, 20 of these [programs] around the country, working together.’’
“We need to populate hospitals with people who think this way,’’ he continued. “Unless we do that, [health care] is going to break the bank.’’
6 comments:
Business guys only react to the almighty dollar. That is their measure and guiding goal. That is why administration often clashes with the clinical side.
Until the incentives are changed, the drive to lower costs (except where they can increase profit)and improve quality will not be embraced. This is what the Obama health care plan attempts to do, but we will see how the intent of the law gets twisted as the details of implementation get put in place.
Leading quality improvement institutions have emerged across the country and internationally for a decade, but HMS seems oblivious to such game-changing rules. We pat ourselves on the back a lot, but we don't look much over our shoulders, do we?
On a similar vein, see NYTimes today:
Researchers in Asian Countries Raise Their Scientific Profiles Worldwide
By LIZ GOOCH
Published: September 12, 2010
New knowledge-intensive economies could fuel construction of hospitals that are LEAN and patient-centered from the ground floor up.
It is interesting to note that except for "medical educators", the degree program does not seem to be aimed at M.D.'s, who are critical participants in, or potential obstacles to, this endeavor. And it is fine to 're-educate' people in mid-career, but it is really the medical students who need training in this area, as noted in the recent Lucian Leape Institute report on medical education.
One of the problems noted in the Leape report is the lack of physician faculty educated in these principles, so perhaps this degree program is at least a first step toward providing them.
nonlocal MD
I believe both Dartmouth and Harvard-- in fact all who are part of the discussion need to talk beyond the delivery of medical care. Certainly a lot of money is spent and it is important, however, we need to define the context of health care delivery. What are the pre-conditions in society, in community, and by individuals in which medical care will work? To only approach the health delivery components dismisses where people learn most of what they know about health, do most of what makes them sick or well, and can support (or not) the actions of medical system. To be responsible planners -- you/we need to speak for the entire system. The whole system needs to be defined and envisioned. For example, what is in the community? What are the parts of the system that promote health, that educate, the structures or organizations that maintain health and assure people are assimilated in their communities. Less that that is simply about medicine and not about health.
As a future graduate student with a lean healthcare background, this degree is intriguing. But my question to all of the healthcare leaders out there is what kind of job does this qualify someone for? Where would an individual with this degree fit you your organization?
Post a Comment