Tuesday, July 20, 2010

Pathologists helping in Haiti

Von Samedi is a fellow in our Department of Pathology who has figured out how to allocate some of his time to assist with the rebuilding of the Haitian health care system. This article in the Journal of the American Society of Clinical Pathology documents the work being done by Von and his colleagues. Excerpts:

Near the collapsed presidential palace and the sprawling tent-and-tarp city across the street, sits the diagnostic laboratory at the State University Hospital of Haiti, the largest public hospital in the country. The lab operates under two large white tents shaded by several large trees. Six months after an earthquake brought Haiti to its knees and in the middle of the rainy season, the dirt all around the lab had become mud.

...Everyone knew this assignment for ASCP’s volunteers would not be simple. After all, one of the laboratories is operating under a tent. But more broadly, the laboratories were affected just like everything else here by the Jan. 12 earthquake.... Some laboratory technicians had died, or moved out of Port-au-Prince. Many who remained were living in tents themselves. And Haiti, a country of 9.6 million people, had just 10 pathologists, only three of them clinical pathologists.

...The volunteers produced reports that included recommendations for lab procedures, organizational charts, workflow charts, employee position descriptions, policies for orientation and competency testing, a form and schedule for the preventive maintenance of equipment, and checklists for keeping track of the functions of the lab.

The volunteers also ran safety procedure trainings on topics such as why it’s important to wash hands and what to do if there were a fire or if a technician were punctured.

Other recommendations included streamlining the clinical-order-to-result process to eliminate steps that do not help patients; eliminating interaction among staff and the public; registering tests in the morning and issuing test results in the afternoon; and reducing the amount of time the laboratories hold samples of urine, blood, and stool from seven days to three days.

“The space issues are tremendous,” Dr. Samedi said. “Plus, these samples just become bacterial time bombs.”

Monday, July 19, 2010

ACL survey for soccer coaches

Speaking of soccer, Susan Sigward, Assistant Professor of Clinical Physical Therapy Director at the USC Community Health and Wellness Research Center, is conducting a survey of soccer coaches. She writes:

USC’s Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy is dedicated to preventing knee injuries in female soccer players. Please take a look at this link describing ProjectPrevent.

We have come to realize that we do not have enough information from a very important source…COACHES. As coaches on the front lines with your athletes, you have valuable information that we need. Please share this information with us by taking this short, anonymous, online survey asking you what you know about these injuries and what you need or want to help prevent them.

We need as many coaches as possible to give us feedback. We would appreciate it, if you could take 10 minutes to complete this online survey. It will be open for the next two weeks. Thank you for your time.

Sunday, July 18, 2010

Getting ready for soccer at Fenway

I just had a chance to watch the initial stages of a unique Fenway Park makeover. The baseball field has to be rebuilt as a soccer pitch. Why? This Wednesday, July 21, at 8pm at "America's Favorite Ballpark," perennial Scottish Premier League contender Celtic Football Club will take on the storied Portuguese futebol club Sporting Clube de Portugal.

This is a good remedy for those of us suffering World Cup withdrawal. I also have a feeling that, for the huge Portuguese speaking constituency in New England, this will be the place to be on Wednesday night.

And for Scots who are Rangers fans? A great opportunity to root against an old rival.

How do you transform a baseball diamond into a soccer pitch? Here are some of the scenes from shortly after the crowd left the ballpark at the end of the fourth Sox-Rangers game.

In this video, you see only the early stages of the transformation. The man in charge of the conversion, Dave Mellor, Director of Groundskeeping, reminds us that attention to detail is the key. The pitching mound is removed and carted away. Bases and base mountings are likewise removed. All surfaces are flattened to a high tolerance. Later, new grass will be laid down to fill in the infield and other dirt surfaces. Lines will be painted. Goals will be erected and corner flags will be placed.

If you cannot see the video, click here.

A delicate balance

Kay Lazar writes in the Boston Globe today about an aspect of the Massachusetts universal health care law that has been developing recently. Under that law, an employer pays a penalty to the state if it choose not to offer health insurance. The lede:

The relentlessly rising cost of health insurance is prompting some small Massachusetts companies to drop coverage for their workers and encourage them to sign up for state-subsidized care instead, a trend that, some analysts say, could eventually weigh heavily on the state’s already-stressed budget.

The article notes,

The state’s landmark 2006 health insurance overhaul included regulations designed to discourage low-wage employees from opting for state health insurance over their companies’ often more pricey coverage. It denied eligibility to any one whose employer had offered him or her coverage in the past six months and paid at least 33 percent toward the individual’s plan.

Most health care advocates and brokers had widely interpreted that to include even workers whose companies had dropped coverage. But recently, some companies that have terminated their group plans have tested those waters and found that their employees were accepted for state-subsidized coverage.

Additionally, company owners say, it has become far cheaper to pay the state penalty for not covering their workers — roughly $295 annually per employee — than to pay thousands more in premiums.

I well remember Jon Kingsdale, the first director of the Health Connector, the agency in charge of all these issues, discussing the delicate balance needed between the penalty to be set, the design of state-subsidized products, and other aspects of the health care market. Too high a penalty, and it is overly punitive to businesses. Too low, and employers would accept the fee to avoid the cost of health benefits and make a run to the state's plans.

The balance seemed about right for the first few years. Now -- if this article is to be believed -- things may have shifted. Politically, it would be very difficult during a recession to start to impose higher penalties on businesses. Likewise, it is would be difficult to make the state plans a less attractive option.

On the other hand, most employers still have an interest in offering an attractive benefit to recruit and retain staff. So maybe the reporter is picking up something happening at the margins that does not have tremendous significance. It is difficult to know, and will bear watching -- both for Massachusetts and for the country, as a similar national plan goes into effect.

Saturday, July 17, 2010

Unboxing e-Patient Dave's book

Here is a parody by Mark Graban of the "unboxing" videos that accompany new high tech devices. If you can't see the video, click here.

Thursday, July 15, 2010

Drowning doesn't look like drowning

A change of topic as a warm weekend approaches here in New England and elsewhere. Jim Weadick, CEO of Newton Medical Center, in Covington, Ga sent me this note, which I share with you. Short version: The person in this picture is probably not drowning.

Paul, I am a big fan of your blog and follow it regularly. The thing I have enjoyed is your dissemination of safety tips and practices. The Oconee Sailing and Yacht Club sent the attached out to all of its members emphasizing water safety awareness. I never read anything quite like it and it was very informative. I know your blog gets wide readership and I thought you might want to include it in a future issue. With water activities at their peak in the summer months perhaps someone will read it and save a life.

This article is on what it looks like when someone is drowning. It's not like in the movies.

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

All-star softball in the park


The Friends of the Public Garden celebrated its 40th anniversary last night (i.e., Tuesday) with an "all star" game of its own in the Boston Common. This was a fund-raising softball game with representatives -- several of the over-the-hill variety -- from local corporations and some elected officials as well. Parks Commissioner Antonia Pollak and Friends President Henry Lee managed the teams.

Regular readers know that soccer, not football, is my game. I'm just not used to using my hands. Nonetheless, I subbed in as the pitcher for the blue team at the top of the third inning, confident of holding our 5-3 lead. By the end of the inning, we were behind 12-5. I issued the following statement to my teammates in this morning's follow-up email:

I hereby issue an apology for my playing: The good news, speaking as the pitcher, was that several of the runs scored during my pitching stint were unearned. The bad news was that at least three of them were attributable to my own fielding errors! (Two or three others were earned, but only because the shortstop couldn't bend down fast enough to nab some ground balls.)

Tom gives a Reason to Ride

Tom DesFosses is a grateful cancer survivor who has organized a biking event to raise funds for cancer research. It will be held on September 12, in Danvers, MA. See here for scenes from last year's ride.

You can register now, here.

Here's Tom making a pitch for the ride. If you can't see the video, click here.

Does Pronovost wear Kevlar?

A friend of mine once said that Dr. Peter Pronovost deserves a Nobel Prize for the work he has done to improve patient safety and reduce harm. Of course, that won't happen because the Nobel Committee does not recognize lives saved through process improvement. (Hmm, maybe someone could start a prize for that.)

The latest contribution is an article in JAMA today entitled, "Learning Accountability for Patient Outcomes." An excerpt*:

Each year, an estimated 100 000 patients die of health care–associated infections, another 44 000 to 98 000 die of other preventable errors, and tens of thousands more die of diagnostic errors or failure to receive recommended therapies. Physicians are overconfident about the quality of care they provide, believing things will go right rather than wrong, assuming they provide higher-quality care than the evidence suggests, and thinking they alone have sufficient knowledge and skills to provide care. Teamwork failures are common contributors to harmful errors. In many cases, someone knew something was wrong and either did not speak up or spoke up and was ignored. It is unclear how many teamwork and communication failures result from arrogance. Most clinicians have personal stories of arrogance causing patient harm.

I have seen two responses among physicians to the things Peter says and does. One reaction is resentment and anger -- ironically often proving thereby the very points he has raised. The other is a respectful recognition and acceptance and desire to learn and improve.

Kudos to Peter for willing to take the heat from those in his own profession for saying the things that need to be said. It cannot be a lot of fun.

Kudos, too, to those in the profession who have taken his lessons to heart and are saving lives every day. They are the ones who provide the "Kevlar" vest, offering Peter the protection of actual clinical outcomes that prove his worth every single day.

----
*Wouldn't you love to read the whole thing? Maybe, someday this influential journal will understand that it would be still more influential if it permitted free access to articles of public import like this.

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

I have to ask one more time

Thanks to a friend for forwarding me this link to this story in the Washington Post: "Hospital infection deaths caused by ignorance and neglect, survey finds."

The pertinent quote: "Pronovost said part of the problem was that many hospital chief executives aren't even aware of their institution's bloodstream infection rates, let alone how easily they could bring them down."

Ugh.

Ours are here for the world to see, mainly to help us hold ourselves accountable to the standard of care to which we aspire. The target is zero, zilch, nada. No other target is intellectually or morally defensible.

I have to ask one more time: What if the Boston hospitals all decided to do this together like those folks in Ohio?

Fat chance of controlling costs

This Wall Street Journal article from a few weeks ago notes that Colorado is now the only state to have an obesity rate below 20%. If you want to watch the pattern of obesity spread over time, check out this post from April 2008.

About a year ago, I made suggestions about the primary causes of health care cost increases and included obesity as one of them.

Paradoxically, now that we have provided more universal access to care, we can expect costs to rise faster. Look here to see evidence of that in France.

Thus far, it has been politically unacceptable to address problems related to obesity. We even have trouble designing a Food Pyramid without the influence of lobbying groups.

Can that change? Unfortunately, cuts in local budgets often flow through in the form of reducing physical education time in schools.

But I remember being a boy and hearing from President Kennedy about the importance of physical fitness. It made a big impression. Would it be possible for today's presidents and governors and mayors to do the same?

Monday, July 12, 2010

Baby arriving soon

e-Patient Dave deBronkart tells us that a birth announcement for his forthcoming book -- Laugh, Sing, and Eat Like a Pig -- will be sent out by Amazon if you sign up here. This is a great story about his experience with kidney cancer and his journey to patient empowerment and collaboration with his doctors.

Now, Mr. President, about the nurses

Sometimes I am just proud and like to brag about our folks. Here's one of those times. Our Charlotte Guglielmi is President of AORN, the Association of periOperative Registered Nurses. You see her here at a national meeting with the patient-in-chief.

Brava, Maureen!

I was out of town when President Obama made his recess appointment of Don Berwick to head CMS, and when the Institute for Healthcare Improvement announced that Maureen Bisognano would take over as CEO. This article from the Wall Street Journal gives more background about Maureen's qualifications and intentions.

Regular readers have often seen Maureen's name on this blog. Her suggestions, for example, have made a huge difference in the way we have made our ICUs more patient- and family-centered.

I think Don would readily admit that she has been the not-so-secret ingredient that has led to IHI's success. I can't think of a more worthy person to take charge of this important organization. Congratulations!

Sunday, July 11, 2010

Lupine carpets

And, a more peaceful scene from the Iceland travelogue.

There are many beautiful wildflowers, most living very close to the ground in the windy environment. But there is one vertical exception. At this time of year, the hills are covered with lupine. Even from miles away, they appear to be coated with a blue carpet. A short video follows from the base of the mountain next to Skagaströnd, called Spákonufell.

Click here if you cannot see the video.

There is wind, too

(Continuing the Iceland travelogue.)

Lots of wind, in fact. You can look up real time weather conditions throughout the country. Click on this map to get the local wind velocity and pattern. An example of my locale on one of the northern peninsulas, here.

This is an important service because sometimes the wind is too strong to drive on the roads. Before you head out, it is good to know if you can get there.

A short video below of what it feels like at ground level when the speed is between 20 and 30 meters/second, or over 50 miles per hour. It took my full strength to walk against the wind. If you walk with the wind, it makes you run. If you park your car wrong, the wind will whip the door out of your hands and almost off the hinges.

Recently, a man was blown off a cliff to his death when he approached it standing up on a gusty day, rather than lying down.

If you can't see the video, click here.

Saturday, July 10, 2010

Fishing in Iceland


I'm just back from a short vacation to Iceland, where my biggest personal accomplishment, under the watchful eye and keen instruction of my friend Jacob, was to learn how to catch trout in one of the local rivers. Here are the before and after pictures of the unlucky fish.

I had been to Iceland before on a business trip, but this time I hung out in Skagaströnd, a fishing village of about 550 people on a peninsula in the north part of the island. There is an old house there where the fortune-teller works (really), and there is a great collection of household items from the very early 1900's. The items show the self-reliance and frugality of the people. Here, for instance, is a plate that someone dropped and cracked over a century ago. It could not be easily replaced, and so you can see how it was reconstructed using supplies that would be available in an isolated village. First, holes were very carefully drilled, a milk-based glue was applied to the joined edges, and then twine was used to hold the plate together. It is still holding.


This town has a great sense of civic pride and lots of interesting stuff going on. Notwithstanding its small size, it hosts an artist residency program, drawing painters, sculptors, and writers from around the world. Each group is welcomed with a pot luck supper provided by local residents. The town is also famous as the home of Hallbjorn Hjartarson, the "Cowboy of the North," Iceland's best known (and maybe only) country Western singer. It hosted a huge annual music festival for many years.

Finally, at the most local level, the teenagers are employed by the town to do local clean-up and beautification work during the summer months. Here, for example, a couple of girls are hand trimming the grass under and next to a fence.

Friday, July 02, 2010

They signed this

I'm taking a blogging break for several days (including no way to post your comments till I start up again) and want to leave you with a treat. Every year, the Boston Globe publishes the Declaration of Independence on its editorial page to remind us about this document. I am doing the same here. Although I take patriotic pleasure in the Declaration, I also present it as one of the finest examples of political argument that exists. Please read it in that way: A group of upstarts trying to persuade established political leaders across the ocean that they have the reason and right to declare independence from one of the world's powers. Also, they are trying to build confidence among their own population that their cause is just.

It is a marvelous piece of writing and worth studying for its form and substance. It is also worth noting that it was signed. (The version above and below, the Dunlap broadside, only has two signatures, but the original had those of all the delegates assembled.) In so doing, people were putting their lives and property at risk -- their own and their families -- setting a firm and clear example of the responsibilities of political freedom and public discourse.

In Congress, July 4, 1776.
A Declaration
By the Representatives of the
United states of America,
In general Congress assembled
.

When in the course of human Events, it becomes necessary for one People to dissolve the Political Bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the Powers of the Earth, the separate and equal Station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent Respect to the Opinions of Mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the Separation.

We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness—-That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute a new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient Causes; and accordingly all Experience hath shewn, that Mankind are more disposed to suffer, while Evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the Forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long Train of Abuses and Usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a Design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their Right, it is their Duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future Security. Such has been the patient Sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the Necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The History of the Present King of Great-Britain is a History of repeated Injuries and Usurpations, all having in direct Object the Establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid World.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public Good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing Importance, unless suspended in their Operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the Accommodation of large Districts of People; unless those People would relinquish the Right of Representation in the Legislature, a Right inestimable to them, and formidable to Tyrants only.

He has called together Legislative Bodies at Places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the Depository of their public Records, for the sole Purpose of fatiguing them into Compliance with his Measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly Firmness his Invasions on the Rights of the People.

He has refused for a long Time, after such Dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the Dangers of Invasion from without, and Convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the Population of these States; for that Purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their Migrations hither, and raising the Conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the Tenure of their Offices, and Amount and Payment of their Salaries.

He has erected a Multitude of new Offices, and sent hither Swarms of Officers to harass our People, and eat out their Substance.

He has kept among us, in Times of Peace, Standing Armies, without the consent of our Legislature.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a Jurisdiction foreign to our Constitution, and unacknowledged by our Laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For quartering large Bodies of Armed Troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from Punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all Parts of the World:

For imposing taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us, in many Cases, of the Benefits of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended Offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an arbitrary Government, and enlarging its Boundaries, so as to render it at once an Example and fit Instrument for introducing the same absolute Rule in these Colonies:

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with Powers to legislate for us in all Cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our Seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our Towns, and destroyed the Lives of our People.

He is, at this Time, transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the Works of Death, Desolation, and Tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty and Perfidy, scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous Ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized Nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the Executioners of their Friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic Insurrections among us, and has endeavoured to bring on the Inhabitants of our Frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known Rule of Warfare, is an undistinguished Destruction, of all Ages, Sexes and Conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions we have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble Terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated Injury. A Prince, whose Character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the Ruler of a free People.

Nor have we been wanting in Attentions to our British Brethren. We have warned them from Time to Time of Attempts by their Legislature to extend an unwarrantable Jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the Circumstances of our Emigration and Settlement here. We have appealed to their native Justice and Magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the Ties of our common Kindred to disavow these Usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our Connections and Correspondence. They too have been deaf to the Voice of Justice and of Consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the Necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of Mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace, Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the World for the Rectitude of our Intentions, do, in the Name, and by the Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly Publish and Declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be, Free and Independent States; that they are absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political Connection between them and the State of Great-Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm Reliance on the Protection of the divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.

Signed by Order and in Behalf of the Congress,
John Hancock, President.

Attest.
Charles Thomson, Secretary.

Thursday, July 01, 2010

Verve and optimism versus caution and pessimism

Many people involved in hospitals wonder how it can be financially prudent for investors to put their money into for-profit ventures that buy non-profit hospitals. (Examples here and here.) After all, the argument goes, the newly privatized entities will have to pay taxes, issue taxable rather than tax-exempt debt, lose the benefit of philanthropy, and otherwise be at a competitive disadvantage compared to their antecedents.

In answer, some might make the case that for-profit firms will run hospitals more efficiently. But this is an unproven and unreliable basis for such transactions. Even if there were some efficiency gains, they would be unlikely to offset the additional costs listed above.

No, the answer lies in the risk-reward expectations of equity investors and of purchasers of high-yield taxable debt.* Those expectations are quite different from purchasers of the municipal or other tax-exempt bonds that support the capital needs of non-profit hospitals. It is the difference between a forward-looking, optimistic view of the world and a backward-looking, cautious view of the world.

Let's start with the tax-exempt debt market, one characterized by risk-averse investors focused on debt coverage ratios and other protections built into indenture agreements. The rating agencies who serve these investors look at the past performance of the non-profit hospitals and ask, "What could go wrong in the future that might put debt service at risk?" There is a highly limited pool of people interested in such debt, and when ratings fall to near or below investor grade, the number of investors becomes smaller still.

Contrast this with people willing to risk their money in the for-profit world. They are sold on the potential for financial gain, not on the proposition of protecting principal. Those offering this paper present business plans and pro forma's based on what might be. Sure, due diligence allows an assessment of the downside, but this pool of investors has hedged their bets by building a diversified portfolio.

How does an equity investor make money in this kind of transaction? Leverage is important. The capital structure of theses deals includes equity, but also a significant component of debt. If the hospital throws off enough cash to pay down the debt, the equity holders see a growing opportunity to earn a current cash return. And hospitals do throw off enough cash -- even hospitals with low or zero margins.

Why? Because the income statement includes a substantial non-cash expense, depreciation. It is the earnings before depreciation that are most meaningful to these investors. As long as immediate capital needs do not exceed available cash, debt will be serviced and equity will likely be rewarded as well on a current basis.

The real payoff, though, occurs when the properties are flipped to another purchaser after a few years.** By then, debt levels have been reduced, and the proceeds from the asset sales enure mainly to the benefit of the shareholders.

We are currently in a phase of capital markets in the United States in which there is a virtually insatiable demand for equity investments of this sort, and also for high yield debt that supports each deal's overall financial structure.

We are also in a period in which non-profit hospital boards and tax-exempt investors are worried about the future. In an odd divergence of perspectives, non-profits worry about decreased reimbursement levels resulting from the national health care reform law; they therefore fear that they will lack capital for renewal and replacement of physical facilities and clinical equipment. For-profit investors, in contrast, see the new law as enabling an increased number of insured citizens to show up as patients in their hospitals; they therefore look forward to growing cash flows to reward their risk-taking.

Mark Twain said, "It is difference of opinion that makes a horse race." Here it is the verve and optimism of the equity markets compared to the caution and pessimism of the non-profit sector. Expect a huge influx of investment capital to change the face of the hospital world over the next two years.

---
* High-yield bonds bear a greater resemblance to equity than they do to traditional tax-exempt debt.
** Or, when the private equity firm sells the venture to a broader group of investors with an initial public offering.

Is it plugged in?

Submitted by a friend of a friend. It is from a cancer patient's on-line journal. This did not take place at our hospital. It could happen almost anywhere, I'm guessing.

In our hospital, this situation would have prompted a "Trigger" because the low oxygen saturation is a Trigger standard, as is "marked nursing concern."
Would our Trigger team notice the root cause?

I thought I'd wait until I'd left the hospital to recount this story. One evening, my friend was visiting and the nursing assistant came in to take my vital signs. My level of blood oxygenation (02 saturation) was lower than normal, and so she called the nurse, who turned up the level of oxygen I was getting through my nose from 3 liters to 6 liters. It didn't seem to help. Then the Reiki lady came to give me my "sample" Reiki treatment (which I liked). Afterward, my oxygen level was no better.

The nursing shift changed and the new nurse was concerned about my "sats". She called a doctor, who couldn't see anything wrong, but was concerned, since I clearly should not have been "desatting". She gave me an EKG. She gave me another EKG. She called another doctor. She ordered a portable chest X-ray. She gave me a nebulizer treatment. This all lasts until nearly midnight.

By this time, I am getting anxious (no matter how hard I try to breathe in deeply through my nose and out through my mouth, I can't seem to get the sats up). So she is also giving me ativan. She suggests to the nurse that she call respiratory therapy and ask them to bring up a mask, so that I can breathe in through both my mouth and my nose. The respiratory therapy guy comes, but before he gives me the mask, he firmly attaches the oxygen tubing to the oxygen source on the wall. It had come loose. No one else checked.

So, I had two doctor visits, two EKGs, a chest X-ray and a nebulizer treatment because it wasn't plugged in.

It's funny.....now.